It stacks up well in terms of grunt, towing capacity, payload and value for money. Find a Dealer Menu. Until I figure out how to make money grow on trees, a Land Cruiser 200 or Discovery 4 was out of the question, and I didn’t really want to buy a second-hand vehicle – again.Second, towing capacity and performance. The highest-spec unit we were driving goes for $56,100, while at the bottom end, you can get one for as little as $48,000. And I genuinely worry for the folk out there who don’t know any better and take the salesman at his word. Around town this still allows for decent pace off a light throttle, aided by peak torque of 380Nm available from 1800-2800rpm.It also remains relatively quiet on the freeway, zipping along at 100km/h with revs hovering around 1800rpm.However, this no-fuss, easy going manner goes out the window once a three tonne load is placed at the rear. The braked 2019 Isuzu D-MAX towing capacity is between 750 kg (0.75 tonnes) and 3500 kg (3.5 tonnes). The … 1 online truck marketplace.Buy and sell new and used construction equipment and machinery at Australia's No. So, third-row seating was important, too.The Isuzu MU-X is built on the same platform as its stablemate, the D-Max, and shares the same 3L four-cylinder turbodiesel engine.It’s been on the market since 2013, and has undergone some revisions since, including to the engine, which can produce 130kW and 430Nm (up from 380Nm a few years ago).Its performance as a tow vehicle is, so far, impressive. Isuzu has also stripped the lid from the storage compartment on top of the dash, leaving an open spot for a phone perhaps, and there are still no power sockets to plug in an aftermarket sat-nav unit mounted to the windscreen.On a more positive note, the cloth seats are reasonably comfortable, and the driving position satisfactory despite a lack of adjustment of the slippery steering wheel.SX-spec grumbles aside, the Isuzu D-MAX still rates above-average in the the towing stakes, regardless of configuration.The under-stressed, never-say-die 3.0-litre turbo-diesel engine and similarly bulletproof Aisin gearbox, remain primary reasons for choosing the D-MAX over often classier rivals. Improved towing. That's higher than other times we've towed with the D-MAX, although our test route this time did include a few stop-starts and hills. There's still more noise in the cabin than in a Ford Ranger or Volkswagen Amarok, and it's slower to respond when you put the foot down, although the engine always feels strong even at low revs.Given its lack of urgency with 2.5 tonnes out back, we would't recommend towing much more than that, even though the D-MAX has a 3500kg maximum. But at least the instruments are more legible in bright sunlight that we remember in the There are most things desired in an off-road ute, including numerous grab handles and rubber mats for the carpeted floors. We’ve got this MU-X for the long haul, both figuratively and literally. With the 800kg pallet in the tub and heading up the hill, Isuzu’s D-Max felt a little nose-up. Unlike the LS-M, the LS-U incorporates an in-dash GPS, rear cabin cooling vents, aluminium side steps, front fog lights, an 8in touchscreen Bluetooth-compatible media player (the LS-M’s is a 7in screen), and more.The interior is quite family-friendly, but in my case, with all kids on board, I really do need to have the eldest in the third row. On the upside, the somewhat bouncy, leaf-sprung rear end calmed down a lot with a decent weight on the tow ball, but there was some noticeable pitching when driving at suburban speeds on less than perfect roads. The towball mass of our 2.4-tonne Franklin Razor caravan wasn’t enough to worry the rear suspension, either statically The Isuzu MU-X has a three-tonne braked towing capacity, which is down from the 3.5 tonnes the stablemate D-Max offers, and a little less than some of the others in the segment. All Rights Reserved. Both the middle and top-spec models get 18in alloys, while the entry level LS-M only gets 16in wheels.The manual transmission is only available in LS-U trim. We'd expect much better consumption and range from the 60 litre tank on a route that included more highways.The engine on our test vehicle was on the wheezy and gruff side, emitting a few vibrations off-the-mark, although it was barely run in with 1000km on the odo.